Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Thomas Jerome Lundy, 16-10140 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 16-10140 Visitors: 109
Filed: Aug. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-10140 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JEROME LUNDY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 31, 2016) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-10140 Date Filed:
More
           Case: 16-10140   Date Filed: 08/31/2016   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 16-10140
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ-4



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                  versus

THOMAS JEROME LUNDY,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (August 31, 2016)

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 16-10140     Date Filed: 08/31/2016    Page: 2 of 2


      Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lundy’s conviction and

sentence is AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer