Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Alex Negrete, 16-11018 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 16-11018 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-11018 Date Filed: 12/16/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-11018 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20651-WJZ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALEX NEGRETE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (December 16, 2016) Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Scott Sakin, appointed counsel for
More
              Case: 16-11018    Date Filed: 12/16/2016   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 16-11018
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20651-WJZ-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

ALEX NEGRETE,
                                                             Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Florida
                         ________________________

                               (December 16, 2016)

Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Scott Sakin, appointed counsel for Alex Negrete in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
              Case: 16-11018    Date Filed: 12/16/2016   Page: 2 of 2


filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Negrete’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer