U.S. v. YOUNGBLOOD, 15-15229 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Number: infco20160713047
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2016
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Charles E. Taylor, court-appointed counsel for Jimmie L. Youngblood in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). In addition, Youngblood has filed two motions for the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Taylor's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is corre
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Charles E. Taylor, court-appointed counsel for Jimmie L. Youngblood in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). In addition, Youngblood has filed two motions for the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Taylor's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correc..
More
DO NOT PUBLISH
PER CURIAM.
Charles E. Taylor, court-appointed counsel for Jimmie L. Youngblood in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). In addition, Youngblood has filed two motions for the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Taylor's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, Taylor's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Youngblood's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Youngblood's motions are DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
