Filed: Mar. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-10228 Date Filed: 03/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-10228 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00014-WLS-TQL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IAN M. BOWENS, a.k.a. New Man, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 17, 2017) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jonathan Dod
Summary: Case: 16-10228 Date Filed: 03/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-10228 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00014-WLS-TQL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IAN M. BOWENS, a.k.a. New Man, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 17, 2017) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jonathan Dods..
More
Case: 16-10228 Date Filed: 03/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10228
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00014-WLS-TQL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
IAN M. BOWENS,
a.k.a. New Man,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(March 17, 2017)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Ian Bowens in this direct criminal
Case: 16-10228 Date Filed: 03/17/2017 Page: 2 of 2
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel 's motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Bowens's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2