Filed: Jan. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-11543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00215-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA CURTIS CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (January 17, 2017) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-11543 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-11543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00215-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA CURTIS CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (January 17, 2017) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: ..
More
Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11543
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00215-CG-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSHUA CURTIS CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(January 17, 2017)
Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 2 of 2
William Hughes, appointed counsel for Joshua Clark in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2