Filed: Oct. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-11962 Date Filed: 10/04/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-11962 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00021-RH-CAS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CRAIG MICHAEL HATHCOCK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 4, 2017) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-119
Summary: Case: 16-11962 Date Filed: 10/04/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-11962 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00021-RH-CAS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CRAIG MICHAEL HATHCOCK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 4, 2017) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-1196..
More
Case: 16-11962 Date Filed: 10/04/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11962
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00021-RH-CAS-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CRAIG MICHAEL HATHCOCK,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(October 4, 2017)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-11962 Date Filed: 10/04/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Barbara Jean Throne, appointed counsel for Craig Michael Hathcock, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hathcock’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2