Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Fernando A. Nino, 16-15230 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 16-15230 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 15, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-15230 Date Filed: 05/15/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-15230 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:89-cr-00169-JDW-MAP-7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FERNANDO A. NINO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 15, 2017) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-15230 Date Filed:
More
           Case: 16-15230   Date Filed: 05/15/2017   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 16-15230
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:89-cr-00169-JDW-MAP-7



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

FERNANDO A. NINO,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (May 15, 2017)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 16-15230     Date Filed: 05/15/2017    Page: 2 of 2


      Ali Kamalzadeh, appointed counsel for Fernando Nino in this appeal of the

denial of Nino’s motion to reduce his sentence, has moved to withdraw from

further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Nino’s

motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer