Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Sebastian Andres-Manuel, 16-15388 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 16-15388 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-15388 Date Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-15388 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00010-JES-MRM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SEBASTIAN ANDRES-MANUEL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 20, 2017) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-15388 Date Fi
More
           Case: 16-15388   Date Filed: 04/20/2017   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 16-15388
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00010-JES-MRM-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                  versus

SEBASTIAN ANDRES-MANUEL,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                              (April 20, 2017)

Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 16-15388     Date Filed: 04/20/2017   Page: 2 of 2


      Keith W. Upson, appointed counsel for Sebastian Andres-Manuel in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of Andres-Manuel’s appeal

is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Andres-Manuel’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer