Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-15388 Date Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-15388 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00010-JES-MRM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SEBASTIAN ANDRES-MANUEL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 20, 2017) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-15388 Date Fi
Summary: Case: 16-15388 Date Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-15388 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00010-JES-MRM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SEBASTIAN ANDRES-MANUEL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 20, 2017) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-15388 Date Fil..
More
Case: 16-15388 Date Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-15388
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00010-JES-MRM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SEBASTIAN ANDRES-MANUEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 20, 2017)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-15388 Date Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Keith W. Upson, appointed counsel for Sebastian Andres-Manuel in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of Andres-Manuel’s appeal
is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Andres-Manuel’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
2