Filed: Jul. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-17235 Date Filed: 07/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-17235 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00505-CEH-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILSON ANGELO GRAHAM, JR., a.k.a. Nu Nee, a.k.a. Noony, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 27, 2017) Before MARTIN, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: Case: 16-17235 Date Filed: 07/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-17235 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00505-CEH-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILSON ANGELO GRAHAM, JR., a.k.a. Nu Nee, a.k.a. Noony, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 27, 2017) Before MARTIN, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
Case: 16-17235 Date Filed: 07/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-17235
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00505-CEH-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILSON ANGELO GRAHAM, JR.,
a.k.a. Nu Nee,
a.k.a. Noony,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 27, 2017)
Before MARTIN, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-17235 Date Filed: 07/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Wilson Graham, Jr. in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Graham’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2