Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Wilson Angelo Graham, Jr., 16-17235 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 16-17235 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-17235 Date Filed: 07/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-17235 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00505-CEH-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILSON ANGELO GRAHAM, JR., a.k.a. Nu Nee, a.k.a. Noony, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 27, 2017) Before MARTIN, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CU
More
           Case: 16-17235   Date Filed: 07/27/2017   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 16-17235
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00505-CEH-AEP-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus


WILSON ANGELO GRAHAM, JR.,
a.k.a. Nu Nee,
a.k.a. Noony,
                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (July 27, 2017)

Before MARTIN, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 16-17235     Date Filed: 07/27/2017   Page: 2 of 2


      Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Wilson Graham, Jr. in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Graham’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer