Filed: Aug. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-10721 Date Filed: 08/29/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-10721 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00052-SDM-MAP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID L. BULLOCK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 29, 2017) Before HULL, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 17-10721 Date File
Summary: Case: 17-10721 Date Filed: 08/29/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-10721 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00052-SDM-MAP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID L. BULLOCK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 29, 2017) Before HULL, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 17-10721 Date Filed..
More
Case: 17-10721 Date Filed: 08/29/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10721
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00052-SDM-MAP-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID L. BULLOCK,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 29, 2017)
Before HULL, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 17-10721 Date Filed: 08/29/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Thomas A. Burns, appointed appellate counsel for David Leon Bullock in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 778
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that the counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bullock’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2