Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jacquel Searles, 17-11945 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 17-11945 Visitors: 102
Filed: Oct. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-11945 Date Filed: 10/19/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-11945 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00267-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JACQUEL SEARLES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (October 19, 2017) Before WLLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jacquel Searles appeals
More
                Case: 17-11945     Date Filed: 10/19/2017   Page: 1 of 2


                                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]



                  IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                           FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                             ________________________

                                   No. 17-11945
                               Non-Argument Calendar
                             ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00267-WTM-GRS-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus


JACQUEL SEARLES,

                                                               Defendant-Appellant.

                             ________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Georgia
                            ________________________

                                   (October 19, 2017)

Before WLLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

         Jacquel Searles appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a

convicted felon. 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), 924(e). Searles argues that his
              Case: 17-11945     Date Filed: 10/19/2017   Page: 2 of 2


trial counsel was ineffective for misadvising him that his prior convictions for

burglary would not be used to enhance his sentence under the Armed Career

Criminal Act. See 
id. § 924(e).
Because the district court did not have an

opportunity to consider this argument and develop a record regarding trial

counsel’s performance, we decline to consider Searles’s argument for the first time

on direct appeal. See United States v. Puentes-Hurtado, 
794 F.3d 1278
, 1285 (11th

Cir. 2015). Searles can raise his argument in a postconviction motion. See 28

U.S.C. § 2255.

       We AFFIRM Searles’s conviction.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer