Filed: Mar. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-13072 Date Filed: 03/07/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-13072 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00191-PGB-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE INGRAM, JR., Defendant- Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 7, 2018) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ali Kamalzadeh, appointed
Summary: Case: 17-13072 Date Filed: 03/07/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-13072 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00191-PGB-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE INGRAM, JR., Defendant- Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 7, 2018) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ali Kamalzadeh, appointed ..
More
Case: 17-13072 Date Filed: 03/07/2018 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-13072
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:16−cr−00191−PGB−KRS−1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESSE INGRAM, JR., Defendant-
Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 7, 2018)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ali Kamalzadeh, appointed counsel for Jesse Ingram, Jr. in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 17-13072 Date Filed: 03/07/2018 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Ingram’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2