Filed: Nov. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-11183 Date Filed: 11/09/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-11183 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00154-BJD-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDREW RYAN LESLIE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 9, 2018) Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-11183 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 18-11183 Date Filed: 11/09/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-11183 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00154-BJD-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDREW RYAN LESLIE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 9, 2018) Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-11183 Date Filed: ..
More
Case: 18-11183 Date Filed: 11/09/2018 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-11183
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00154-BJD-JBT-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANDREW RYAN LESLIE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 9, 2018)
Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 18-11183 Date Filed: 11/09/2018 Page: 2 of 2
The Office of the Federal Defender, appointed counsel for Andrew Leslie in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Leslie has also filed a motion for appointment of new counsel.
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, Leslie’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED, and Leslie’s
motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED as moot.
2