U.S. v. BATTIS, 17-13770 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Number: infco20180316127
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2018
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for D'Angelo Battis in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for D'Angelo Battis in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, ..
More
DO NOT PUBLISH
PER CURIAM.
Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for D'Angelo Battis in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Battis's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
