U.S. v. CHRISTIE, 17-12758 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Number: infco20180913088
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2018
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Joshua Eugene Christie in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Joshua Eugene Christie in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion ..
More
DO NOT PUBLISH
PER CURIAM.
Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Joshua Eugene Christie in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Christie's conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
