U.S. v. FORD, 17-14385 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Number: infco20180919089
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2018
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Justin Ford in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdra
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Justin Ford in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw..
More
DO NOT PUBLISH
PER CURIAM.
Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Justin Ford in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ford's revocation of supervised release, his sentence imposed upon revocation, and the denial of his motions for miscellaneous relief and reconsideration are AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
