U.S. v. FIEDLER, 18-10199 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Number: infco20181115086
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2018
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rachel Seaton, appointed counsel for David Fiedler in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withd
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH PER CURIAM . Rachel Seaton, appointed counsel for David Fiedler in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdr..
More
DO NOT PUBLISH
PER CURIAM.
Rachel Seaton, appointed counsel for David Fiedler in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fiedler's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
