Filed: Oct. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-16486 _ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD DR. DAVID S. MURANSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellee, JAMES H. PRICE, ERIC ALAN ISAACSON, Interested Parties - Appellants, versus GODIVA CHOCOLATIER, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Flo
Summary: Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-16486 _ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD DR. DAVID S. MURANSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellee, JAMES H. PRICE, ERIC ALAN ISAACSON, Interested Parties - Appellants, versus GODIVA CHOCOLATIER, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Flor..
More
Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16486 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD DR. DAVID S. MURANSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellee, JAMES H. PRICE, ERIC ALAN ISAACSON, Interested Parties - Appellants, versus GODIVA CHOCOLATIER, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Defendant - Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges*: * Judge Jill Pryor, having recused herself, did not participate in the poll. Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 2 of 2 A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed, a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
