Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-14214 Date Filed: 01/22/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-14214 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:98-cr-00108-LSC-TMP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BACKARI MACKEY, a.k.a. Bakari Mackey, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (January 22, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, GRANT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Kev
Summary: Case: 17-14214 Date Filed: 01/22/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-14214 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:98-cr-00108-LSC-TMP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BACKARI MACKEY, a.k.a. Bakari Mackey, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (January 22, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, GRANT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Kevi..
More
Case: 17-14214 Date Filed: 01/22/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-14214
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:98-cr-00108-LSC-TMP-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BACKARI MACKEY,
a.k.a. Bakari Mackey,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(January 22, 2019)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, GRANT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin L. Butler, appointed counsel for Backari Mackey in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 17-14214 Date Filed: 01/22/2019 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the district court’s order modifying the terms of Mackey’s
supervised release is AFFIRMED. 1
1
We note that Mackey has apparently satisfied the district court’s special supervised-
release condition that he reside in a halfway house for six months, and that he is no longer subject
to that condition. To the extent this renders his appeal moot, the proceedings are hereby dismissed.
See United States v. Farmer,
923 F.2d 1557, 1568 (11th Cir. 1991) (holding that appeal from
sentence was rendered moot by the defendant’s release from custody).
2