Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Pedro Antwan Bishop, 18-11244 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 18-11244 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-11244 Date Filed: 02/06/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-11244 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00041-RH-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO ANTWAN BISHOP, a.k.a. Godfather, a.k.a. Sugar Bear, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (February 6, 2019) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER
More
           Case: 18-11244   Date Filed: 02/06/2019   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-11244
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00041-RH-GRJ-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

PEDRO ANTWAN BISHOP,
a.k.a. Godfather,
a.k.a. Sugar Bear,
                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (February 6, 2019)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-11244    Date Filed: 02/06/2019   Page: 2 of 2


      Donna Duncan, appointed counsel for Pedro Bishop in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Bishop’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer