Filed: Feb. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-11244 Date Filed: 02/06/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-11244 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00041-RH-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO ANTWAN BISHOP, a.k.a. Godfather, a.k.a. Sugar Bear, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (February 6, 2019) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: Case: 18-11244 Date Filed: 02/06/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-11244 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00041-RH-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO ANTWAN BISHOP, a.k.a. Godfather, a.k.a. Sugar Bear, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (February 6, 2019) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER ..
More
Case: 18-11244 Date Filed: 02/06/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-11244
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00041-RH-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO ANTWAN BISHOP,
a.k.a. Godfather,
a.k.a. Sugar Bear,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(February 6, 2019)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 18-11244 Date Filed: 02/06/2019 Page: 2 of 2
Donna Duncan, appointed counsel for Pedro Bishop in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Bishop’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2