Filed: Sep. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-14225 Date Filed: 09/20/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-14225 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:17-cr-00215-CEM-DCI-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID HARDMAN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 20, 2019) Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-14225 Date Filed: 09/20
Summary: Case: 18-14225 Date Filed: 09/20/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-14225 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:17-cr-00215-CEM-DCI-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID HARDMAN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 20, 2019) Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-14225 Date Filed: 09/20/..
More
Case: 18-14225 Date Filed: 09/20/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-14225
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:17-cr-00215-CEM-DCI-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID HARDMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 20, 2019)
Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 18-14225 Date Filed: 09/20/2019 Page: 2 of 2
Aliza Hochman Bloom, an Assistant Federal Defender and appointed
counsel for David Bruce Hardman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). In response, Hardman moved for leave
to dismiss his counsel and proceed pro se on appeal. Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Hardman’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED, and Hardman’s motion is DENIED
AS MOOT.
2