Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Claudia Constance Hirmer, 18-14518 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 18-14518 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-14518 Date Filed: 12/05/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-14518 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:08-cr-00079-MCR-CJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLAUDIA CONSTANCE HIRMER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 5, 2019) Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-145
More
           Case: 18-14518   Date Filed: 12/05/2019   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-14518
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:08-cr-00079-MCR-CJK-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                  versus


CLAUDIA CONSTANCE HIRMER,


                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (December 5, 2019)

Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-14518     Date Filed: 12/05/2019   Page: 2 of 2


      Claudia Hirmer, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of her motion to

access grand jury transcripts. Hirmer sought to use the transcripts to prepare an

application for a certificate of appealability, which we have since denied. And we

have denied her motion for reconsideration of that order. Because “we can no

longer offer [Hirmer] any effectual relief,” Gagliardi v. TJCV Land Tr., 
889 F.3d 728
, 733 (11th Cir. 2018), we dismiss her appeal as moot.

      APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer