Elawyers Elawyers

United States v. Patrick Randell McIntish, 19-10131 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-10131 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-10131 Date Filed: 10/15/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-10131 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00018-TWT-JKL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK RANDELL MCINTOSH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (October 15, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-10
More
           Case: 19-10131   Date Filed: 10/15/2019   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-10131
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00018-TWT-JKL-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus


PATRICK RANDELL MCINTOSH,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Northern District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                            (October 15, 2019)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-10131     Date Filed: 10/15/2019    Page: 2 of 2


      William A. Morrison, appointed counsel for Patrick McIntosh in this appeal

from an order of civil commitment, entered pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243, has

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of

the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

order committing McIntosh to the custody of the Attorney General is

AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer