Filed: Oct. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2020
Summary: USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-10792 _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-00549-MW-GRJ CONRAAD L. HOEVER, Plaintiff – Appellee-Cross Appellant, versus C. CARRAWAY, Correctional Officer, et al., Defendants, R. MARKS, Correctional Officer, C. PAUL, Correctional Officer Sergeant, Defendants - Appellants - Cross Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ USC
Summary: USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-10792 _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-00549-MW-GRJ CONRAAD L. HOEVER, Plaintiff – Appellee-Cross Appellant, versus C. CARRAWAY, Correctional Officer, et al., Defendants, R. MARKS, Correctional Officer, C. PAUL, Correctional Officer Sergeant, Defendants - Appellants - Cross Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ USCA..
More
USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10792 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-00549-MW-GRJ CONRAAD L. HOEVER, Plaintiff – Appellee-Cross Appellant, versus C. CARRAWAY, Correctional Officer, et al., Defendants, R. MARKS, Correctional Officer, C. PAUL, Correctional Officer Sergeant, Defendants - Appellants - Cross Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 2 of 2 Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
