Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-12959 Date Filed: 03/18/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-12959 _ OSHRC Docket No. 17-1595 RANDALL MECHANICAL, INC., Petitioner, versus SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. _ Petition for Review of a Decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission _ (March 18, 2020) Case: 18-12959 Date Filed: 03/18/2020 Page: 2 of 2 Before JORDAN, TJOFLAT, and TRAXLER,* Circuit Judge
Summary: Case: 18-12959 Date Filed: 03/18/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-12959 _ OSHRC Docket No. 17-1595 RANDALL MECHANICAL, INC., Petitioner, versus SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. _ Petition for Review of a Decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission _ (March 18, 2020) Case: 18-12959 Date Filed: 03/18/2020 Page: 2 of 2 Before JORDAN, TJOFLAT, and TRAXLER,* Circuit Judges..
More
Case: 18-12959 Date Filed: 03/18/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-12959
________________________
OSHRC Docket No. 17-1595
RANDALL MECHANICAL, INC.,
Petitioner,
versus
SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
________________________
Petition for Review of a Decision of the
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
________________________
(March 18, 2020)
Case: 18-12959 Date Filed: 03/18/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Before JORDAN, TJOFLAT, and TRAXLER,∗ Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Following oral argument, and a review of the record, we vacate the ALJ’s
order granting the Secretary’s motion for reconsideration and dismissing Randall
Mechanical’s notice of contest. As we have explained, the “[Occupational Safety
and Health Review] Commission and its ALJs are bound to follow the law of the
circuit to which the case would most likely be appealed.” Comtran Grp., Inc. v. U.S.
Dep’t of Labor,
722 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2013). The Commission has said
the same thing. See Sec’y of Labor v. Interstate Brands Corp.,
20 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA)
1102, *3 n.7,
2003 WL 1961274 (2003) (applying Third Circuit law with respect to
the Secretary’s burden of proof regarding a certain violation). We therefore remand
to the ALJ with instructions to apply Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit precedent
with respect to Randall Mechanical’s Rule 60(b)(1) motion. We express no view on
the merits of that motion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
∗The Honorable William B. Traxler, Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the
Fourth Circuit, sitting by designation.
2