Filed: Jul. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-11916 Date Filed: 07/13/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-11916 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cv-00883-MHC STEWART S. RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (July 13, 2020) Before WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and CORRIGAN,* District Judge. * Honorable Timot
Summary: Case: 19-11916 Date Filed: 07/13/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-11916 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cv-00883-MHC STEWART S. RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (July 13, 2020) Before WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and CORRIGAN,* District Judge. * Honorable Timoth..
More
Case: 19-11916 Date Filed: 07/13/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-11916
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cv-00883-MHC
STEWART S. RICHARDSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(July 13, 2020)
Before WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and CORRIGAN,* District
Judge.
*
Honorable Timothy J. Corrigan, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida,
sitting by designation.
Case: 19-11916 Date Filed: 07/13/2020 Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
This appeal arises from Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston’s
reduction of Stewart S. Richardson, Jr.’s monthly long-term disability benefits.
Richardson contends that Liberty wrongfully reduced his benefits in violation of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.
The district court denied his motion for summary judgment and granted Liberty’s
motion for judgment on the administrative record. Richardson appeals both
rulings. Having considered the briefs and record, and with the benefit of oral
argument, we affirm both rulings for the reasons given by the district court in its
well-reasoned order, filed April 15, 2019.
AFFIRMED.
2