Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-11987 Date Filed: 01/23/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-11987 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00484-SCB-JSS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUBEN LONGORIA, a.k.a. Scooter, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 23, 2020) Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-11
Summary: Case: 19-11987 Date Filed: 01/23/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-11987 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00484-SCB-JSS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUBEN LONGORIA, a.k.a. Scooter, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 23, 2020) Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-119..
More
Case: 19-11987 Date Filed: 01/23/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-11987
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00484-SCB-JSS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RUBEN LONGORIA,
a.k.a. Scooter,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 23, 2020)
Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-11987 Date Filed: 01/23/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Ruben Longoria, Jr., in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Longoria’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2