Filed: Mar. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-13199 Date Filed: 03/23/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13199 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00179-SDM-CPT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GREGARIO FUENMAYOR PALLARES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 23, 2020) Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13199 Dat
Summary: Case: 19-13199 Date Filed: 03/23/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13199 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00179-SDM-CPT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GREGARIO FUENMAYOR PALLARES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 23, 2020) Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13199 Date..
More
Case: 19-13199 Date Filed: 03/23/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-13199
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00179-SDM-CPT-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE GREGARIO FUENMAYOR PALLARES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 23, 2020)
Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-13199 Date Filed: 03/23/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Daniel F. Daly, appointed counsel for Jose Gregario Fuenymayor Pallares in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pallares’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2