Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jose Gregario Fuenmayor Pallares, 19-13199 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-13199 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-13199 Date Filed: 03/23/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13199 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00179-SDM-CPT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GREGARIO FUENMAYOR PALLARES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 23, 2020) Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13199 Dat
More
           Case: 19-13199   Date Filed: 03/23/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-13199
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00179-SDM-CPT-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus


JOSE GREGARIO FUENMAYOR PALLARES,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (March 23, 2020)

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-13199     Date Filed: 03/23/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      Daniel F. Daly, appointed counsel for Jose Gregario Fuenymayor Pallares in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of

the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pallares’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer