Filed: Apr. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/06/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13439 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00223-RBD-EJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO OQUENDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 6, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/
Summary: Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/06/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13439 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00223-RBD-EJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO OQUENDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 6, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/0..
More
Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/06/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-13439
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00223-RBD-EJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERTO OQUENDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 6, 2020)
Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/06/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Attorney Charles E. Taylor, Jr., appointed counsel for Roberto Oquendo in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
Oquendo and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Oquendo’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2