Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Roberto Oquendo, 19-13439 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-13439 Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/06/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13439 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00223-RBD-EJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO OQUENDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 6, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13439 Date Filed: 04/
More
           Case: 19-13439   Date Filed: 04/06/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-13439
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00223-RBD-EJK-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

ROBERTO OQUENDO,

                                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (April 6, 2020)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-13439     Date Filed: 04/06/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      Attorney Charles E. Taylor, Jr., appointed counsel for Roberto Oquendo in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of

Oquendo and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Oquendo’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                             2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer