Filed: Jun. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-14020 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14020 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00123-SPC-MRM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE MARIO MORENO PARADA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 12, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 1
Summary: Case: 19-14020 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14020 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00123-SPC-MRM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE MARIO MORENO PARADA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 12, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19..
More
Case: 19-14020 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-14020
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00123-SPC-MRM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE MARIO MORENO PARADA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 12, 2020)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-14020 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Jose Parada in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Parada’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2