Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jose Mario Moreno Prarada, 19-14020 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-14020 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-14020 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14020 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00123-SPC-MRM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE MARIO MORENO PARADA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 12, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 1
More
            Case: 19-14020   Date Filed: 06/12/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 19-14020
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00123-SPC-MRM-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JOSE MARIO MORENO PARADA,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                              (June 12, 2020)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-14020     Date Filed: 06/12/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Jose Parada in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Parada’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer