Filed: Jun. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-14079 Date Filed: 06/05/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14079 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-B-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADRIANNE DAVIS MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (June 5, 2020) Before WILSON, MARTIN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-14079 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 19-14079 Date Filed: 06/05/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14079 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-B-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADRIANNE DAVIS MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (June 5, 2020) Before WILSON, MARTIN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-14079 Date Filed: 0..
More
Case: 19-14079 Date Filed: 06/05/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-14079
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-B-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADRIANNE DAVIS MILLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(June 5, 2020)
Before WILSON, MARTIN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-14079 Date Filed: 06/05/2020 Page: 2 of 2
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal
waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert,
997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (appeal waiver will be enforced if it was
made knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Bascomb,
451 F.3d
1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by
comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry,
399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes
waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant
error).
2