Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jorge Contino Valhuerdis, 19-14829 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-14829 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-14829 Date Filed: 06/10/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14829 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20701-MGC-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE CONTINO VALHUERDIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 10, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19
More
            Case: 19-14829   Date Filed: 06/10/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 19-14829
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20701-MGC-4



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JORGE CONTINO VALHUERDIS,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                              (June 10, 2020)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-14829     Date Filed: 06/10/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      Joseph Chambrot, counsel for Jorge Valhuerdis, in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Valhuerdis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer