Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Kenneth Bernard Smith, 20-10040 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 20-10040 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2020
Summary: Case: 20-10040 Date Filed: 08/27/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10040 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00096-CEM-DCI-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH SMITH, a.k.a. Kenneth Corn, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 27, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, JILL PRYOR and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER
More
             Case: 20-10040    Date Filed: 08/27/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                               No. 20-10040
                           Non-Argument Calendar
                         ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00096-CEM-DCI-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus


KENNETH SMITH,
a.k.a. Kenneth Corn,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.
                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                        ________________________

                               (August 27, 2020)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, JILL PRYOR and BRASHER, Circuit
Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 20-10040     Date Filed: 08/27/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      A. Brian Phillips, appointed counsel for Kenneth Smith in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Smith’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer