Filed: Aug. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2020
Summary: Case: 20-10040 Date Filed: 08/27/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10040 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00096-CEM-DCI-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH SMITH, a.k.a. Kenneth Corn, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 27, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, JILL PRYOR and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: Case: 20-10040 Date Filed: 08/27/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10040 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00096-CEM-DCI-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH SMITH, a.k.a. Kenneth Corn, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 27, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, JILL PRYOR and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER ..
More
Case: 20-10040 Date Filed: 08/27/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-10040
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00096-CEM-DCI-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KENNETH SMITH,
a.k.a. Kenneth Corn,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 27, 2020)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, JILL PRYOR and BRASHER, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10040 Date Filed: 08/27/2020 Page: 2 of 2
A. Brian Phillips, appointed counsel for Kenneth Smith in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Smith’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2