Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. William Leslie New, 20-10553 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 20-10553 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2020
Summary: Case: 20-10553 Date Filed: 06/15/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10553 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00116-TFM-B UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM LESLIE NEW, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (June 15, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10553 Date Filed:
More
           Case: 20-10553   Date Filed: 06/15/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 20-10553
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00116-TFM-B


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus


WILLIAM LESLIE NEW,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Alabama
                      ________________________

                             (June 15, 2020)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 20-10553     Date Filed: 06/15/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      Patricia Kemp, appointed counsel for William New in this revocation of

supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and New’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer