Filed: Jun. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2020
Summary: Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10962 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00469-RAL-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERT JOSEPH SCIPIONE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 12, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, GRANT and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10
Summary: Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10962 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00469-RAL-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERT JOSEPH SCIPIONE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 12, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, GRANT and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 20-109..
More
Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-10962
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00469-RAL-MAP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERT JOSEPH SCIPIONE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 12, 2020)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, GRANT and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Attorney Lynn Bailey, appointed counsel for Albert Scipione in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of
Scipione, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Scipione’s revocation of supervised
release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2