Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hastorf Contracting Co. v. Ocean Transportation Corporation, 94 (1924)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 94 Visitors: 61
Judges: Rogers, Hough, and Manton, Circuit Judges
Filed: Nov. 21, 1924
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: 4 F.2d 584 (1924) HASTORF CONTRACTING CO., Libelant-Appellee, v. OCEAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee, James C. Davis, as Director General of Railroads, etc., Impleaded-Respondent-Appellee, William Spencer & Son Corporation, Respondent-Appellant. No. 94. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 21, 1924. Spitz & Bromberger, of New York City (Edgar Bromberger, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Wm. Spencer & Son. Foley & Martin, of New York City (William J. Ma
More
4 F.2d 584 (1924)

HASTORF CONTRACTING CO., Libelant-Appellee,
v.
OCEAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee,
James C. Davis, as Director General of Railroads, etc., Impleaded-Respondent-Appellee,
William Spencer & Son Corporation, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 94.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 21, 1924.

Spitz & Bromberger, of New York City (Edgar Bromberger, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Wm. Spencer & Son.

Foley & Martin, of New York City (William J. Martin and George V. A. McCloskey, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant-appellee.

Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (John W. Crandall, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent Ocean Transportation Corporation.

Macklin, Brown & Van Wyck, of New York City, for James C. Davis.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer