Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

1432 Broadway Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev., 20, Docket 20234 (1947)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 20, Docket 20234 Visitors: 5
Judges: Swan, Chase, and Frank, Circuit Judges
Filed: Mar. 27, 1947
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 160 F.2d 885 (1947) 1432 BROADWAY CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 20, Docket 20234. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 27, 1947. Charles Korn, of New York City (Jacob Rabkin and Mark H. Johnson, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for respondent. Before SWAN, CHASE, and FRANK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The facts are stated in the opinion of the
More
160 F.2d 885 (1947)

1432 BROADWAY CORPORATION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 20, Docket 20234.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 27, 1947.

Charles Korn, of New York City (Jacob Rabkin and Mark H. Johnson, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.

Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Tax Court, 4 T.C. 1158, and need not be here repeated. The issue presented was whether the taxpayer was entitled under section 23(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, ยง 23(b), to deduct interest accrued within the taxable years on its outstanding debentures. The Tax Court denied deduction on the ground that the evidence did not show that "the debentures were, or were intended to be, evidences of indebtedness"; they were "more nearly like preferred stock than indebtedness." These conclusions are not within the scope of our judicial review. John Kelley Co. v. Commissioner, 326 U.S. 521, 698, 66 S. Ct. 299; Elliott-Lewis Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 154 F.2d 292. We may add, however, that, if the question were open to us, we should reach the same result as did the Tax Court.

Order affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer