Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Weiss v. United States, 22399 (1952)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 22399 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 29, 1952
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 199 F.2d 454 WEISS v. UNITED STATES. No. 31. Docket 22399. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued October 8, 1952. Decided October 29, 1952. Sidney Morse, New York City, for appellant. Frank J. Parker, U. S. Atty., Nathan Borock, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., Holmes Baldridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., D. Vance Swann and Thomas E. Walsh, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee. Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 D
More

199 F.2d 454

WEISS
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 31.

Docket 22399.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued October 8, 1952.

Decided October 29, 1952.

Sidney Morse, New York City, for appellant.

Frank J. Parker, U. S. Atty., Nathan Borock, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., Holmes Baldridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., D. Vance Swann and Thomas E. Walsh, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Dismissal of the complaint is affirmed on the opinion below, 103 F. Supp. 470, and on the authority of Weiss v. United States, 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 610, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 820, 72 S. Ct. 38; Jones v. United States, 8 Cir., 189 F.2d 601; Parker v. Veterans Administration of United States, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 149. Dismissal of the complaint rendered moot the plaintiff's motions, and the orders denying them are likewise affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer