Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hillcrea Export & Import Co., Inc., Bristol-King Co., Inc., and Bachrack Bros., Inc. v. Universal Insurance Company, 22722_1 (1954)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 22722_1 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 29, 1954
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 212 F.2d 206 HILLCREA EXPORT & IMPORT CO., Inc., Bristol-King Co., Inc., and Bachrack Bros., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 216, Docket 22722. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued April 7, 1954. Decided April 29, 1954. Nathan, Mannheimer, Asche & Winer and Enrico S. Sanfilippo, New York City (Alfred B. Nathan, A. J. Asche, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellants. Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City (M
More

212 F.2d 206

HILLCREA EXPORT & IMPORT CO., Inc., Bristol-King Co., Inc.,
and Bachrack Bros., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 216, Docket 22722.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued April 7, 1954.
Decided April 29, 1954.

Nathan, Mannheimer, Asche & Winer and Enrico S. Sanfilippo, New York City (Alfred B. Nathan, A. J. Asche, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellants.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City (Martin P. Detels, Vincent L. Leibell, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before CHASE, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

It is clear that the judgment cannot be reversed unless finding of fact, especially those appearing in the appellants' appendix as Nos. 11 and 13, are set aside. These findings are supported by substantial evidence and the inferences drawn from the facts, being reasonable ones, are likewise supported. Consequently, no error has been shown.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer