Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

23699_1 (1956)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 23699_1 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 16, 1956
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 232 F.2d 311 Giovanni TESORIERO, Libelant-Appellant, v. THE M. S. MOLDA her boilers, engines, tackle, etc., and A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi and Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., Inc., Respondents. No. 297. Docket 23699. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued April 3, 1956. Decided April 16, 1956. Nathan Baker, Hoboken, N. J. (Baker, Garber & Chazen, of counsel; Bernard Chazen, Hoboken, N. J., on the brief), for libelant-appellant. Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City (Franci
More

232 F.2d 311

Giovanni TESORIERO, Libelant-Appellant,
v.
THE M. S. MOLDA her boilers, engines, tackle, etc., and A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi and Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., Inc., Respondents.

No. 297.

Docket 23699.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 3, 1956.

Decided April 16, 1956.

Nathan Baker, Hoboken, N. J. (Baker, Garber & Chazen, of counsel; Bernard Chazen, Hoboken, N. J., on the brief), for libelant-appellant.

Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City (Francis X. Byrn, New York City, of counsel), for respondents-appellees.

Before FRANK, MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

After the trial judge filed his opinion and entered his order dismissing the libel on the ground of laches, we decided Le Gate v. The Panamolga, 2 Cir., 221 F.2d 689. We reverse and remand with directions to the judge to reconsider the defense of laches, and to exercise his discretion, in the light of the Le Gate decision.

2

Reversed and remanded.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer