Filed: Apr. 28, 1959
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: 266 F.2d 27 Hubert TYRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 237, Docket 25467. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued April 6, 1959. Decided April 28, 1959. Morris Hirschhorn, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant. Francis X. Byrn, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, and J. Ward O'Neill, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The denial of an
Summary: 266 F.2d 27 Hubert TYRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 237, Docket 25467. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued April 6, 1959. Decided April 28, 1959. Morris Hirschhorn, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant. Francis X. Byrn, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, and J. Ward O'Neill, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The denial of an i..
More
266 F.2d 27
Hubert TYRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 237, Docket 25467.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 6, 1959.
Decided April 28, 1959.
Morris Hirschhorn, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Francis X. Byrn, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, and J. Ward O'Neill, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The denial of an injunction constitutes an appealable order. 28 U.S.C.A. 1292(a)(1). We think the lucid and wellreasoned opinion of Judge Ryan, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 172 F. Supp. 363, is a complete answer to the plaintiff's contentions here.
