Filed: Mar. 23, 1961
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 287 F.2d 409 Max MILLET and Dora Millet, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 283, Docket 26704. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Feb. 20, 1961. Decided March 23, 1961. Louis Granick, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs-appellants. Richard S. Harrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before HINCKS and MOO
Summary: 287 F.2d 409 Max MILLET and Dora Millet, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 283, Docket 26704. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Feb. 20, 1961. Decided March 23, 1961. Louis Granick, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs-appellants. Richard S. Harrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before HINCKS and MOOR..
More
287 F.2d 409
Max MILLET and Dora Millet, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 283, Docket 26704.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Feb. 20, 1961.
Decided March 23, 1961.
Louis Granick, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Richard S. Harrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, Cistrict Judge.
PER CURIAM.
1
Affirmed on the opinion below, 189 F. Supp. 88.
