Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In the Matter of Swan-Finch Oil Corporation, Keta Gas and Oil Company, Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, Debtors, 27885_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 27885_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 16, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 313 F.2d 140 In the Matter of SWAN-FINCH OIL CORPORATION, Keta Gas and Oil Company, Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, Debtors. No. 260, Docket 27885. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued Jan. 14, 1963. Decided Jan. 16, 1963. Arthur D. Emil, New York, N.Y., for appellant Peter Jakobson. George C. Levin, New York, N.Y., for appellees George C. Levin and James V. Hallisey, Trustees of Swan-Finch Oil Corporation, Keta Gas and Oil Company and Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporatio
More

313 F.2d 140

In the Matter of SWAN-FINCH OIL CORPORATION, Keta Gas and
Oil Company, Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, Debtors.

No. 260, Docket 27885.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 14, 1963.
Decided Jan. 16, 1963.

Arthur D. Emil, New York, N.Y., for appellant Peter Jakobson.

George C. Levin, New York, N.Y., for appellees George C. Levin and James V. Hallisey, Trustees of Swan-Finch Oil Corporation, Keta Gas and Oil Company and Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, Debtors.

Before MEDINA, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is one of a series of proceedings in the complicated affairs of the debtors in the Chapter X bankruptcy of the debtors described in the title of this case. Under the circumstances we think a reversal of this order might render nugatory and futile further action by Judge Palmieri. See Ferguson v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 288 F.2d 665, affirming sub nom. Ferguson v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1960, 190 F. Supp. 506; McDonnell v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 731, affirming, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 196 F. Supp. 496; Pettit v. Doeskin Products, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 270 F.2d 95, rehearing denied, 270 F.id 699, cert. denied, 362 U.S. 910, 80 S. Ct. 660, 4 L. Ed. 2d 618; Saltzman v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1957, 156 F. Supp. 538.

2

The appeal is from the order of November 30, 1962, appointing a receiver of the premises at 1050 Park Avenue, New York City. We affirm. See opinion below filed November 7, 1962, 213 F. Supp. 638.

3

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer