Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert E. Clune v. Publishers' Association of New York City, 28085_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 28085_1 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 06, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 314 F.2d 343 Robert E. CLUNE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PUBLISHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 309, Docket 28085. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued March 5, 1963. Decided March 6, 1963. John R. Harold, of Harold, Luca, Persky & Mozer, New York City, for the plaintiffs-appellants. John R. Schoemer, Jr., of Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City (Philip D. Pakula and Lorentz W. Hansen, New York City, on the brief), for defend
More

314 F.2d 343

Robert E. CLUNE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PUBLISHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 309, Docket 28085.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1963.
Decided March 6, 1963.

John R. Harold, of Harold, Luca, Persky & Mozer, New York City, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

John R. Schoemer, Jr., of Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City (Philip D. Pakula and Lorentz W. Hansen, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before CLARK and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment for defendants is affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Levet, D.C., 214 F. Supp. 520.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer