Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tom E. Rodgers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 28158_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 28158_1 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 18, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 323 F.2d 996 Tom E. RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 79. Docket 28158. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued October 18, 1963. Decided October 18, 1963. Jacob Rassner, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant. Alexander & Green, New York City, (Donald M. Dunn, Alfred C. Moran, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee. Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 We affirm the judgment below in ope
More

323 F.2d 996

Tom E. RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79.

Docket 28158.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued October 18, 1963.

Decided October 18, 1963.

Jacob Rassner, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Alexander & Green, New York City, (Donald M. Dunn, Alfred C. Moran, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We affirm the judgment below in open court.

2

From the testimony of plaintiff in his deposition below it is clear that the accident suffered by him occurred under such circumstances that his sole and exclusive remedy was under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. The complaint below alleged jurisdiction by virtue of the Federal Employers' Liability Act. Thus, the motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. O'Rourke, 344 U.S. 334, 73 S. Ct. 302, 97 L. Ed. 367 (1952).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer