Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

William C. Stolk and Eve Stolk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 28520 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 28520 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 29, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 326 F.2d 760 William C. STOLK and Eve Stolk, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 250. Docket 28520. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued January 29, 1964. Decided January 29, 1964. Kenneth C. Quencer, New York City, (Emil R. Annunziato, New York City, on the brief), for petitioners-appellants. Frederick E. Youngman, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Robert N. Anderson,
More

326 F.2d 760

William C. STOLK and Eve Stolk, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 250.

Docket 28520.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued January 29, 1964.

Decided January 29, 1964.

Kenneth C. Quencer, New York City, (Emil R. Annunziato, New York City, on the brief), for petitioners-appellants.

Frederick E. Youngman, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Robert N. Anderson, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm in open court the decision of the Tax Court for the reasons stated in the majority opinion of that court, written by Judge Harron and reported at 40 T.C. 345 (1963).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer