Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412 Edward Serzysko, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, 33097 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 33097 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 20, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 409 F.2d 1360 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412 Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant. Nos. 531, 532, Dockets 33096, 33097. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued April 22, 1969. Decided May 20, 1969. Arthur C. Fink, New York City (Fink, Weinberger & Levin, New York City, and Walter Talmont, Hempstead, N.Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant-appellee. A. Donald MacKinnon, New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McC
More

409 F.2d 1360

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412
Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee,
v.
The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Nos. 531, 532, Dockets 33096, 33097.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 22, 1969.
Decided May 20, 1969.

Arthur C. Fink, New York City (Fink, Weinberger & Levin, New York City, and Walter Talmont, Hempstead, N.Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant-appellee.

A. Donald MacKinnon, New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-respondent-appellant.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WYATT, District Judge.1

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm in all respects the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York for the reason stated in the thorough and well reasoned opinion of Judge Graven reported at 290 F. Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1968).

1

Sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer