Filed: Sep. 17, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 449 F.2d 1305 Lincoln Roy BUCKLEY and Everlast-Saw and Carbide Tools, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas C. GIBNEY, Deputy District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service for the District of New York, Defendant-Appellee. EVERLAST-SAW AND CARBIDE TOOLS, INC., and Lincoln Roy Buckley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 147, 148, Dockets 71-1342, 71-1666. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Sept. 17, 1971. Decid
Summary: 449 F.2d 1305 Lincoln Roy BUCKLEY and Everlast-Saw and Carbide Tools, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas C. GIBNEY, Deputy District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service for the District of New York, Defendant-Appellee. EVERLAST-SAW AND CARBIDE TOOLS, INC., and Lincoln Roy Buckley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 147, 148, Dockets 71-1342, 71-1666. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Sept. 17, 1971. Decide..
More
449 F.2d 1305
Lincoln Roy BUCKLEY and Everlast-Saw and Carbide Tools,
Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Thomas C. GIBNEY, Deputy District Director Immigration and
Naturalization Service for the District of New
York, Defendant-Appellee.
EVERLAST-SAW AND CARBIDE TOOLS, INC., and Lincoln Roy
Buckley, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 147, 148, Dockets 71-1342, 71-1666.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Sept. 17, 1971.
Decided Sept. 17, 1971.
Charles A. Giulini, Jr., Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joseph P. Marro, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, Stanley H. Wallenstein, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.
Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The order of Judge Wyatt is affirmed on the basis of his opinion below, 332 F. Supp. 790, and the order of Judge Croake is affirmed on the basis of his memorandum below.
