Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Remington Arms Company, Inc. v. United States, 722 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 722 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 18, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 461 F.2d 1268 72-2 USTC P 16,066 REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant. No. 722, Docket 71-2188. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued June 28, 1972. Decided July 18, 1972. Gary R. Allen, Atty., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Richard W. Perkins, Attys., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Stewart H. Jones, U. S. Atty., New H
More

461 F.2d 1268

72-2 USTC P 16,066

REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 722, Docket 71-2188.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued June 28, 1972.
Decided July 18, 1972.

Gary R. Allen, Atty., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Richard W. Perkins, Attys., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Stewart H. Jones, U. S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Richard C. Pugh, New York City (Ronald A. Partnoy, Bridgeport, Conn., Roger W. Thomas, Stephen L. Cohen, and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MOORE, SMITH and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm the order and judgment of the District Court upon the well reasoned opinion of Arthur H. Latimer, United States Magistrate (D.Conn.1971), as approved and adopted by the District Court, Robert C. Zampano, District Judge.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer