Filed: May 22, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 496 F.2d 1198 UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHINA UNION LINES LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 927, Docket 73-2552. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued May 9, 1974. Decided May 22, 1974. James H. Simonson, New York City (Bigham Englar Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant. Edward H. Duggan, Jr., New York City (Hill, Betts & Nash, Eli Ellis, Allan J. Berdon, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Be
Summary: 496 F.2d 1198 UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHINA UNION LINES LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 927, Docket 73-2552. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued May 9, 1974. Decided May 22, 1974. James H. Simonson, New York City (Bigham Englar Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant. Edward H. Duggan, Jr., New York City (Hill, Betts & Nash, Eli Ellis, Allan J. Berdon, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Bef..
More
496 F.2d 1198
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHINA UNION LINES LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 927, Docket 73-2552.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued May 9, 1974.
Decided May 22, 1974.
James H. Simonson, New York City (Bigham Englar Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
Edward H. Duggan, Jr., New York City (Hill, Betts & Nash, Eli Ellis, Allan J. Berdon, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before ANDERSON, FEINBERG and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Motley. 375 F. Supp. 652 (1974).
